Equalisation Levy was introduced in India in 2016, with the intention of taxing the digital transactions i.e. the income accruing to foreign e-commerce companies from India. It was aimed at taxing business to business transactions and was applicable to consideration received or receivable for specified services provided. The CBDT vide Notification dated 28th October, 2020, introduced the Equalisation levy (Amendment) Rules, 2020, in order to amend the Equalisation levy Rules, 2016.
Equalisation Levy is a direct tax, which is withheld at the time of payment by the service recipient. The following conditions are to be met to be liable to equalisation levy:
The Equalization Levy is imposed on net receipts from online business flexibly. Further, the Equalization Levy is outside the ambit of income tax as it was presented through Finance Act, 2016, and is accordingly not covered by twofold tax assessment evasion arrangements (DTAAs). Thus, non-occupants exposed to Equalization Levy can't guarantee alleviation under DTAAs and won't be qualified for credit for Equalization Levy paid in India in their nation of home.
The charge of equalisation levy will be at the pace of 6% of the measure of thought for any predefined administration got or receivable by an individual, being a non-resident from:
The equalisation levy shall not be charged, when:
From the 1st of April, 2020, equalisation levy was charged at 2% of the amount of consideration received/receivable by an e-commerce operator from e-commerce supply or services made, provided or facilitated by it:
Specified circumstances as mentioned in the 2nd point means:
The equalisation levy shall not be charged to an e-commerce operator:
Let us now understand as to what amendments were brought into effect with the introduction of Equalisation levy (Amendment) Rules, 2020
According to Rule 2(aa), electronic verification code means a code generated for the electronic verification of the person furnishing the statement of specified services as per the data structure and standards laid down by the Principal Director- General of Income-tax (Systems) or Director General of Income-tax (Systems), as the case may be.
Rule 3 of Equalisation levy Rules, 2016 pertained to Rounding off of consideration for specified services, equalisation levy, etc. In the old Rule 3 it was stated that, the amount of consideration for specified services and the amount of Equalisation levy, interest and penalty payable, and the amount of refund due, under the provisions of Chapter VIII of the Act shall be rounded off to the nearest multiple of Rs 10 and, for this purpose any part of a rupee consisting of paise shall be ignored and thereafter if such amount is not a multiple of 10, then, if the last figure in that amount is 5 or more, the amount shall be increased to the next higher amount which is a multiple of 10 and if the last figure is less than 5, the amount shall be reduced to the next lower amount which is a multiple of 10 In the amended Rule 3, the words “specified services” is removed
Rule 4 pertains to payment of equalisation levy. According to the amended Rule 4, the assessee or e-commerce operator, who is required to deduct and pay equalisation levy, shall pay the amount of such levy, by remitting it into the RBI or in any branch of the State Bank of India or of any authorised Bank accompanied by an equalisation levy challan.
Rule 5 pertains to Statement of specified services. According to the amended Rule 5, the said statement required to be furnished under section 167(1) or 167(2) shall be in Form No. 1, duly verified in the manner indicated therein, and may be furnished by the assessee or e-commerce operator, as the case may be.
Furnishing Form-No 1 shall be in the following manner:
Form No. 1 required to be furnished under section 167(1) shall be furnished on or before the 30th of June immediately following that financial year.
The Principal Director-General of Income-tax (Systems) or Director General of Income-tax (Systems), as the case may be, for the purpose of ensuring secure capture and transmission of data, shall:
Rule 7 of Equalisation levy Rules, 2016 pertained toNotice of demand. Proviso to Rule 7 has now been amended. In the proviso, the words “assessee or e-commerce operator, as the case may be,” shall be substituted, for the word “assessee”.
Rule 8 pertains to Form of appeal to Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)].
Rule | As per Equalisation levy Rules, 2016 | As per Equalisation levy (Amendment) Rules, 2020 |
---|---|---|
8(1) | An appeal under section 174(1) to the CIT (A) shall be made in Form No. 3 in the following manner: electronically under digital signature; orelectronically through electronic verification code. | An appeal under section 174(1) to the CIT (A) shall be made in Form No. 3 in the following manner: electronically under digital signature; orelectronically through electronic verification code. |
8(2) | The form of appeal, shall be verified by the person who is authorised to verify the statement of specified services under rule 5, as applicable to the assessee. | The form of appeal, shall be verified by the person who is authorised to verify the statement under rule 5, as applicable to the assessee or e-commerce operator, as the case may be |
8(3) | Any document accompanying Form No.3 shall be furnished in the manner in which the Form No.3 is furnished. | Any document accompanying Form No. 3 shall be furnished in the same manner in which the Form No. 3 is furnished. |
8(4) | The Principal Director General of Income-tax (Systems) shall- lay down the procedure for electronic filing of Form No.3;lay down the data structure, standards and manner of generation of electronic verification code, for the purpose of verification of the person furnishing the said form; andbe responsible for formulating and implementing appropriate security, archival and retrieval policies in relation to the said form so furnished. | The Principal Director General of Income-tax (Systems) or Director General of Income-tax (Systems), as the case may be, for the purpose of ensuring secure capture and transmission of data, shall: lay down the procedure for electronic filing of Form No.3lay down the data structure, standards and manner of generation of electronic verification code, for the purpose of verification of the person furnishing the said form; andbe responsible for formulating and implementing appropriate security, archival and retrieval policies in relation to the said form so furnished. |
Rule 9 of Equalisation levy Rules, 2016 pertained to Form of appeal to Appellate Tribunal. In the said rule, the words “assessee or e-commerce operator, as the case may be,” shall be substituted, for the word “assessee”.
It is also important to note that the format for Form No 1, Form No 3 and Form No 4 has also been amended by the Equalisation levy (Amendment) Rules, 2020.
The equalisation levy in India from June 1, 2016 is a presumptive tax on some specified services provided by non-residents in the ‘hard to tax’ digital sector. In a market dominated by a few big players, because of the network effect and cost characteristics, it corrects the obviously unfair advantage that some non-resident companies without permanent establishments (PEs) enjoy over domestic players tempting even resident digital companies to become non-residents.